ESPN：米兰前锋圣地亚哥因脚踝伤势将缺席5周时间（ESPN：米兰前锋圣地亚哥脚踝受伤，预计缺阵五周）

Considering verification methods

I’m thinking about the risk of fabricating details, so I should really avoid that. Instead, I could ask a clarifying question like: “Would you like me to summarize, translate, provide context, or verify with sources?” Offering to analyze the potential impact could be useful too. I should keep my response concise and focused on one helpful question, maybe even paraphrasing key details from a source like ESPN while considering who might step up in the situation.Avoiding specific names

I’m thinking that naming players might not be the best move. For instance, I can mention that AC Milan has several forwards but I should avoid specifics like who left or who signed, especially since some information might be unconfirmed. It could be safer to keep it general and discuss the potential impacts instead, asking the user if they'd like me to rewrite, analyze the schedule, or verify details. I can propose options while also clarifying which player they mean if there's any ambiguity.Clarifying player names

I noticed there's a player named "Santiago," possibly a youth player like Santiago Castilla, but I should confirm the full name to avoid any confusion, such as with Santiago Giménez. My response should include a quick rewrite that mentions an injury report while asking if the user wants me to verify the original source and add more details. I'll also politely request the full name since there aren’t many players registered as "Santiago" on the current roster. Let’s get this ready!